- Dec 18, 2013
- 22,301
- 4,216
- Parrots
- Maya (Female Solomon Island eclectus parrot), Jolly (Male Solomon Island eclectus parrot), Bixby (Male, red-sided eclectus. RIP), Suzie (Male cockatiel. RIP)
I believe that some of the opposing viewpoints here aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. Michael is saying that declawing a cat is different from clipping a bird's wing in that declawing is an inherently permanent and irreversible tactic, whereas a bird's flight feathers actually can grow back.
This is true.
However, Rosembers point is that clipping does have a point in common with declawing in that both measures modify "an animal from its natural state."
This also is true.
You won't find either declawed cats or clipped birds in nature (ostriches and kakapos notwithstanding). So whether you're for clipping or against it, it's obviously not natural.
Allee expanded on Rosember's position by pointing out that clipping CAN be as permanently crippling to a bird as declawing is to a cat, depending on the circumstances. A bird clipped before fledging will likely be permanently affected by the procedure. The same is true of a bird given a bad clip, be it wings clipped unevenly or too short. "Butcher jobs" can forever damage a bird's confidence in his/her ability to fly, or cause more direct harm by causing said bird to either fly into walls or objects, or plummet to the ground.
Point is, similarities can be drawn. But one cannot be de facto equated to the other, as the effects of declawing are always irreversible... and the effects of wing clipping are only irreversible dependent upon the circumstances.
That said, I personally don't clip. But I also don't begrudge those who do.
And Rosember, I honestly don't think Michael was trying to hurt your feelings. He speaks bluntly, true, and those unused to the very direct nature of his words may well take offense. But to those who know his straightforward nature for what it is, his unfiltered candor becomes something to be appreciated... whether or not they agree with the point being made. Know what I mean?
I agreed wholeheartedly with Chantal's point that we get back to the OP's original question, but I really didn't want to leave all of that unaddressed.
Newsunmommy, while I do believe clipping would be the easier way to curb your bird's behaviors, I don't personally view it as the optimal solution. Like Rosember and Allee, I see it as the very last resort. Especially since some birds become psychologically damaged by the experience. (Doesn't always happen, I know. But it CAN happen.)
While training a flighted bird with behavioral issues can be challenging and rather uniquely frustrating, it IS possible. It's just harder is all.
But in my opinion, worth every moment of aggravation.
Please keep us updated, however, whichever path you ultimately choose.
This is true.
However, Rosembers point is that clipping does have a point in common with declawing in that both measures modify "an animal from its natural state."
This also is true.
You won't find either declawed cats or clipped birds in nature (ostriches and kakapos notwithstanding). So whether you're for clipping or against it, it's obviously not natural.
Allee expanded on Rosember's position by pointing out that clipping CAN be as permanently crippling to a bird as declawing is to a cat, depending on the circumstances. A bird clipped before fledging will likely be permanently affected by the procedure. The same is true of a bird given a bad clip, be it wings clipped unevenly or too short. "Butcher jobs" can forever damage a bird's confidence in his/her ability to fly, or cause more direct harm by causing said bird to either fly into walls or objects, or plummet to the ground.
Point is, similarities can be drawn. But one cannot be de facto equated to the other, as the effects of declawing are always irreversible... and the effects of wing clipping are only irreversible dependent upon the circumstances.
That said, I personally don't clip. But I also don't begrudge those who do.
And Rosember, I honestly don't think Michael was trying to hurt your feelings. He speaks bluntly, true, and those unused to the very direct nature of his words may well take offense. But to those who know his straightforward nature for what it is, his unfiltered candor becomes something to be appreciated... whether or not they agree with the point being made. Know what I mean?
I agreed wholeheartedly with Chantal's point that we get back to the OP's original question, but I really didn't want to leave all of that unaddressed.
Newsunmommy, while I do believe clipping would be the easier way to curb your bird's behaviors, I don't personally view it as the optimal solution. Like Rosember and Allee, I see it as the very last resort. Especially since some birds become psychologically damaged by the experience. (Doesn't always happen, I know. But it CAN happen.)
While training a flighted bird with behavioral issues can be challenging and rather uniquely frustrating, it IS possible. It's just harder is all.
But in my opinion, worth every moment of aggravation.
Please keep us updated, however, whichever path you ultimately choose.
Last edited: