Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
Budgies also don't use their feet to hold things!Grass parakeets and cockatiels from Australia are the only ones I know of that don't use their feet.
Will be interested to hear others
Love birds do, but not as often
Hi Stormy, they grouped in the grass seed parakeet family. At least that's how I've thought of them?Budgies also don't use their feet to hold things!
Budgies are grass parakeets.Hi Stormy, they grouped in the grass seed parakeet family. At least that's how I've thought of them?
Maybe that's an old term? I'm not the best at nomenclature.
Neophema Parakeets — Australia's Feathered Beauties - Organization of Professional Aviculturists
© Anne-Marie Harter Neophemas are some of the World’s most perfect birds. They are the size of a budgerigar, with pleasant-sounding voices and few vices. They come in a rainbow of brilliant colors, and their versatility in the wild makes them adaptable aviary birds. Also known as Australian...www.proaviculture.com
nope. they are different types of parrotsBudgies are grass parakeets.
from what I remember red winged parrots and plum headed parakeets don't use their legs - or at least in my observationGrass parakeets and cockatiels from Australia are the only ones I know of that don't use their feet.
Will be interested to hear others
Love birds do, but not as often
no, budgies have never been as grass parrots. It's a name for parakeets of genus Neophema. Also, it is used as a synonym of the red rumped parrots, but more common meaning is Neophema genusHi Stormy, they grouped in the grass seed parakeet family. At least that's how I've thought of them?
Maybe that's an old term? I'm not the best at nomenclature.
Neophema Parakeets — Australia's Feathered Beauties - Organization of Professional Aviculturists
© Anne-Marie Harter Neophemas are some of the World’s most perfect birds. They are the size of a budgerigar, with pleasant-sounding voices and few vices. They come in a rainbow of brilliant colors, and their versatility in the wild makes them adaptable aviary birds. Also known as Australian...www.proaviculture.com
I think the question comes down to, are grass parakeets the Neophema genus only or does the name grass parakeet include other small long tailed mainly grass-seed eating parakeets?nope. they are different types of parrots
the term "grass parrots" is usually used only for Neophema - however you can buy a book about them and there's also Psephotus genus included (I mean the old classification, because the book is so old - in the current classification there are 4 genera included: Neophema, Neopsephotus, Psephotus and um... Psephella? I don't remind how it was called, but nevermind)I think the question comes down to, are grass parakeets the Neophema genus only or does the name grass parakeet include other small long tailed mainly grass-seed eating parakeets?
I recall in the 90s reading a discussion of Australian grass eating parakeets and finches which seemed to lump the small mainly grass eating keets from arid regions together as grass parakeets. But it looks to me like current usage of “grass parakeet” is indeed for Neophema genus alone.
Worldbirds.com, all things nature.org and the spruce pets both have great explanations of different types of parakeets (under “grass parakeet classification “) and what is meant by ‘grass parakeet.’ New world encyclopedia statesI think the question comes down to, are grass parakeets the Neophema genus only or does the name grass parakeet include other small long tailed mainly grass-seed eating parakeets?
I recall in the 90s reading a discussion of Australian grass eating parakeets and finches which seemed to lump the small mainly grass eating keets from arid regions together as grass parakeets. But it looks to me like current usage of “grass parakeet” is indeed for Neophema genus alone.
(Added this whole previous poster was also composing their post.)
Yeah, they aren't in neophema. But budgies have been called grass parakeetsno, budgies have never been as grass parrots. It's a name for parakeets of genus Neophema. Also, it is used as a synonym of the red rumped parrots, but more common meaning is Neophema genus
I see, did you edit Wikipedia? As grass parrotkeets was one of the common names used were listed as last time I looked .no, budgies have never been as grass parrots. It's a name for parakeets of genus Neophema. Also, it is used as a synonym of the red rumped parrots, but more common meaning is Neophema genus
Ha, archaic, lol not so old as that my freind.With the archaic names it may be possible - I know "official" and common English names, but I don't really know about the archaic ones, which weren't based on the classification. I've heard about strange names such as "swift lorikeet" for the swift parrot despite they aren't lorikeets. Probably such mistakes made in the common names come from similar behavior/look etc. Swift parrots aren't lorikeets but they have similar diet. The same with budgies - they aren't grass parrots, but they have the same diet.
Now everything is clear, maybe let's come back to the thread main subject
Zenek scratching his head using his feather
I'm not familiar with these, thanks I will have to learn about them.from what I remember red winged parrots and plum headed parakeets don't use their legs - or at least in my observation
Nope, it wasn't me. But I remember there had been used much more names in the past. Probably there were no references to them so somebody deleted them (if we talk about Budgerigar article)I see, did you edit Wikipedia?
yep, all.ROZALKA, are all Neophema from Australia?
Maybe this non use of foot to hold food in parrot is only some species found in Australia?
(Wasn’t meaning to disrespect you, Rosalia, I just wanted to understand where my error came from and how the classification worked.).Nope, it wasn't me. But I remember there had been used much more names in the past. Probably there were no references to them so somebody deleted them (if we talk about Budgerigar article)