Is it normal to keep the ID ring on a birds leg its whole life? (UK)

[BlueBird95]

Hi folks!

I recently just bought a 4 month old blue indian ring neck parrot from local pet store after years of not owning birds however I've noticed that he has a red ID ring on his leg. I was wondering is this something that stays on his whole life? I did ask the pet shop and they suggested that it is normal for birds to have these on for life. I also asked if they could remove it however they refused and said it should stay on.

I don't remember any of my cockatiels or budgies having these rings on them back in the day when I last owned pet birds. I think that Blue (thats his name) may have his as he was in a petshop and delivered in a bache of both males and females therefor my thinking is that it may have been a way for the pet shop to identify the males from females and same vice versa however to my knowledge it doesn't serve any kind of use now . (they were DNA tested for anyone wondering)

I very highly doubt hell ever need identified by someone and if he does they'l already know who he is, what kind of bird he is and his gender

I suppose the question here is , should it be removed & is it required? and also if anyone could tell me the pros and cons of keeping it on as well as i just can't see any use for it. I know it isn't cruel but it just ruins the birds beauty in my eyes having this ID ring on its leg and as its companion theres just something inside me that thinks its not right such a gorgeous bird has this ring on.

Im guessing that if it can be remove it is best to wait now until he's fully trained and allows me to even get close to it. He is not tame at all. however, he's definitely not a shy bird and I do remain very hopeful we will bond closley enough where he will be fully hand trained, be target trained and learn tricks on command therefor EVENTUALLY (even if it takes years) will allow me close enough to get it off (if thats the route we go)

The other option is of-course taking him to a avian vet to have it removed after he's target and hand trained enough and atleast settled in as many online articles I looked up suggested to do but none I read really giving me a range of opinons or advice on this subject

All input on this would be appreciated.

I wouldn't want to do anything or attempt anything that may betray his trust and set us back in the bonding process. The reality of it is that he'll probably have this thing on his leg now for a long time Im just wondering the pros and cons of having it (if any)

looking forward to everyones opinions.

 

[SailBoat]

Your position regarding the ring is correct. Other than at the Breeder's and the Pet Store's inventory control the band provides zero use beyond that point. They are in fact a danger as the band can be caught and seriously damage the foot or cause it loss can occur.

The Pet Store is likely refusing to remove the band because of the high likelihood of damaging the leg with the cutting tool. Best to have the Vet remove it as 'if' there is a problem they are trained to stop the bleeding.

In North America our Courts do not recognize bands as identification! Hence not Proof of Ownership. Currently, Microchips are accepted as Proof of Ownership!

Keep on loving your Indian!

 

[GaleriaGila]

I agree! What Boats said!
I had the Rb's ring removed when I got him but saved it all these decades.