My first avian vet told me that not long ago, Patagonians were classified as mini-macaws...
Makes sense to me: the largest mini is, I believe, the Severe. It's about the same length and size as a Patagonian. Patagonians surely LOOK a lot like macaws...
But they wound up as conures. WHICH is perfectly COOLIO!!!
Just curious... any avian biologists/scholars here who can shed light on bird classifications in general or specific? How's it decided?
I know that plants are classified based on flower anatomy and such.
What about birds???
Makes sense to me: the largest mini is, I believe, the Severe. It's about the same length and size as a Patagonian. Patagonians surely LOOK a lot like macaws...
But they wound up as conures. WHICH is perfectly COOLIO!!!
Just curious... any avian biologists/scholars here who can shed light on bird classifications in general or specific? How's it decided?
I know that plants are classified based on flower anatomy and such.
What about birds???