GambotheGreyt
Active member
- Feb 8, 2024
- 137
- 117
- Parrots
- Currently.. congo african grey
I'm not sure if this particular comparison has been made, so I want to ask and ramble
.
These are both organic feeds as I understand. They are also highly recommended. But they are starkly different from one another.
In regards to Harrison's, I am referring to high potency formula.
The Harrison's does include ingredients that many are against in theory, but perhaps because they are not using GMO or perhaps because they are toasting these products, it makes them appropriate for our parrots.
Many have used Harrison's successfully for years and are pleased. Harrison's has a long track record, but they promote their products based on successful breeding programs. Well most of us only have companion parrots. My parrot has now successfully switched to Harrison's.
Tops is also highly recommended but using an unconventional first ingredient of alfalfa. As well, they list a number of quality ingredients indicating the benefits of each, but one particular exception is Barley, which is the second ingredient. As well, they indicate that 95% of the total makeup of the pellets is alfalfa, barley, rice, and millet. This means that the content of the other twenty ingredients is negligible at best.
The nutritional differences are big, particularly in regards to fat content. I also wonder about vit D in Tops. I think it is 0, whereas in Harrisons it is supplemented. I would generally say that most of our parrots are not getting unfiltered access to sunshine.
Someone may answer that it is personal preference or whatever your parrot will eat, etc. but if both are readily eaten by the parrot, etc. which one is the "better" choice (for house pets)? Why? (And yes of course I do not expect a consensus, but perhaps thoughts will be shared that I have not considered.)
Thanks in advance for your input!

These are both organic feeds as I understand. They are also highly recommended. But they are starkly different from one another.
In regards to Harrison's, I am referring to high potency formula.
The Harrison's does include ingredients that many are against in theory, but perhaps because they are not using GMO or perhaps because they are toasting these products, it makes them appropriate for our parrots.
Many have used Harrison's successfully for years and are pleased. Harrison's has a long track record, but they promote their products based on successful breeding programs. Well most of us only have companion parrots. My parrot has now successfully switched to Harrison's.
Tops is also highly recommended but using an unconventional first ingredient of alfalfa. As well, they list a number of quality ingredients indicating the benefits of each, but one particular exception is Barley, which is the second ingredient. As well, they indicate that 95% of the total makeup of the pellets is alfalfa, barley, rice, and millet. This means that the content of the other twenty ingredients is negligible at best.
The nutritional differences are big, particularly in regards to fat content. I also wonder about vit D in Tops. I think it is 0, whereas in Harrisons it is supplemented. I would generally say that most of our parrots are not getting unfiltered access to sunshine.
Someone may answer that it is personal preference or whatever your parrot will eat, etc. but if both are readily eaten by the parrot, etc. which one is the "better" choice (for house pets)? Why? (And yes of course I do not expect a consensus, but perhaps thoughts will be shared that I have not considered.)
Thanks in advance for your input!