Many people advocate clipping "for the bird's safety", but it's very important to remember that a clipped bird can (unless the wings ware completely butchered) still fly. So, a clipped bird can still fly (or walk, for that matter) through an open door; they can still fly into the toilet and drown; they can still fly into a pan of boiling water. So many people become complacent and think that because their bird is clipped, they don't have to supervise or keep them away from dangers. It is also my impression that a significant majority of escaped parrots in the UK were, in fact, clipped.
Then, of course, there are the health implications of not allowing a bird to fly (whether that's by clipping its wings, or by keeping it in a cage all the time).
Every case is individual and needs to be assessed on an individual basis, but I'll never understand why someone who doesn't want a pet that flies, would get a bird... And it really isn't all that hard to make it safe for your parrot to fly. And if you feel that you can't have a flying parrot because of other parrots, other pets, etc, then why in the world did you get the parrot (or the other pets, whichever came second)? Just doesn't make sense to me. If you have a parrot and get another, and find that they fly and attack each other, why can't you give them out of cage time separately? And if you haven't got time to give them separate out of cage times, why on earth did you get a second parrot?
(This isn't aimed at anyone in particular - many people turn to wing clipping because of unwanted flying behaviours or aggression - but it really bugs me when people clip by default because they simply don't want a pet that flies...)
I'm sorry, I'm really trying to be objective, but it's so hard when it comes to wing clipping. So few people that clip have a "good" reason for doing it. The above is NOT aimed at the OP, it's just me ranting about one of my pet peeves.
